Books And Gifts

Books

 

Visitors

 

Added toxicity in light cigarettes

Researchers at the University of California, Riverside have recently discovered that smoke produced by "light" cigarettes contain higher levels of toxicity than their full flavored counterparts. These findings will come as a shock to smokers who have changed their smoking habits to accommodate the perceived slightly less harmful option.

For a number of years, tobacco companies have marketed light variety cigarettes under the assumption that they are "safer" than the more traditional brands. However, recent findings have shown that this is not the case. Light brand cigarette smoke contains more toxins than their traditional cousins. Even more concerning is that tobacco companies have, for a long time, labeled the chemicals produced by light cigarettes as safe, despite the fact that the effect of many of these toxins have not been tested.

Prue Talbot, a professor of cell biology in UCR and the head researcher for this project, has noted that the toxic effects produced from light cigarettes has an adverse effect on both reproduction and fetal development in their mice test subjects. She also concludes that these effects are more than likely to be replicated and problematic in human embryonic development.

The research team used pre-implanted mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) for this study. Their aim was to compare the toxic effects on the embryonic cells from smoke produced by both light and traditional variety cigarettes. Additionally, the effects of two types of smoke; main-stream, inhaled smoke and side-stream smoke, the smoke produced by burning cigarettes, were studied.

The findings with this study showed that main-stream and side-stream smoke produced by both light and traditional cigarettes were toxic to the pre-implanted embryos. Both retarded embryonic growth and killed the early formed cells. However, what was most shocking to the researchers was that both types of smoke produced from the light brand cigarettes contained far more toxicity that smoke produced from the traditional cigarettes.

“This result was unexpected since harm reduction brands purportedly have lower concentrations of toxicants,” stated Talbot.

Moreover, experimental findings also showed that, on a per puff basis, the effects of the side-stream smoke from both cigarette types was far more potent than that produced by main-stream smoke. The main reason for this, Talbot noted, is that side stream smoke burns at a lower temperature than inhaled smoke, and thus contains higher levels of toxins.

Olga Genbacev, a senior researcher for the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences at UCSF reports on the findings: “This study for the first time sends a clear message to nonsmoking women of reproductive age who are planning to become pregnant that they must avoid exposure to side-stream smoke.”

Talbot and her team have already began to replicate this study using pre-implanted human embryonic stem cells. So far, the results produced are very similar to those of the mESC studies.

The results of this study appear in the journal Human Reproduction (published online, Nov. 29). A hard copy is set to be released in January, 2009.

 

Original Source -Clinically Psyched

Authors -Clinically Psyched

Check back often for more breaking clinical psychology news.